https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758626 --- Comment #29 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Qianqian Fang from comment #27) > > > Here we can see that the license checker has detected a lot of licenses (including AGPLv3+ and GPLv2), so the package cannot be just GPLv3+. > > all the licenses included in this software are GPLv3+ compatible, except > AGPLv3+, which is stricter, although it is also listed under GPL compatible > licenses > > https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses > > which means I can declare all of them under the GPLv3+ license as a full > package. If I have to distinguish GPLv3+ and AGPLv3+, please suggest how to > do it. I want to make sure that AGPLv3+ only covers tetgen, but not other > part of the software (which are covered under GPLv3+). You need to add a comment explaining the breakdown # Main package: GPLv3+ # JMeshLib: GPLv2 # Tetgen: AGPLv3+ License: GPLv3+ and GPLv2 and AGPLv3+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
