[Bug 1751138] Review Request: flamethrower - dnsperf alternative

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751138

Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |POST
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+



--- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> ---
 - As said before, 

Requires:       ldns%{?_isa}
Requires:       libuv%{?_isa}

are not needed, the libs are picked up automatically, you can check this by
doing:

rpm -q --requires -p flamethrower-0.10-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm   | sort -f | uniq 

you'll see the .so being required.



Package is accepted, please fix the aforementioned issue before import.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux