https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758626 --- Comment #2 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq@xxxxxxxxx> --- This packaging request can be found in https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/issue/146 This package is configured as a "semi-noarch" package according to the comments in http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385257#c5 https://pagure.io/koji/issue/19 > "Sometimes the content in a package can be run anywhere, but some underlying dependency is only > available on a subset of arches" this suites this package quite well - most scripts can function without the binary dependencies in the bin/ folder, thus deserves the noarch designation. If I set the package BuildArch to anything other than noarch, rpmbuild will fail because something in macros.octave does not seem to support arch dependent files, this seems to be related to this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413450 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
