[Bug 1751138] Review Request: flamethrower - dnsperf alternative

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751138



--- Comment #4 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #1)
> Some general hints:
> 
> Drop this line:
> - %global commit v%{version}
> 
> Simplify those lines:
> - URL:		https://github.com/DNS-OARC/flamethrower
> - Source0:
> https://github.com/DNS-OARC/%{name}/archive/%{commit}/%{name}-%{commit}.tar.
> gz
> + URL:		https://github.com/DNS-OARC/%{name}
> + Source0:	%{url}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-v%{version}.tar.gz
This is good, I think it should be used.
> 
> - Patch1:		flamethrower-0.10-libuv.patch
> + Patch1:		%{name}-0.10-libuv.patch
No, I do no think %{name} is useful when listing files. It should be named as
it is. Those files are named the same on filesystem.
Changing spec file name does not rename them. It is more handy to just select
and paste on full form.
> 
> - make %{?_smp_mflags}
> + %make_build
> 
> Why does %make_install not work though cmake is used to generate a useful
> Makefile?
No rules where it should be installed was given I suppose. It just lacks
install target.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux