[Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker
Alias: gurlchecker

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-10-04 12:33 EST -------
(In reply to comment #16)
> Also i haven't put gurlchecker in bodhi as yet. It's better to do after the
> issues are fixed...right?
Yes.


Well, for 0.10.1-2:

* Possibly missing BuildRequires
  - I usually checks possibly missing BuildRequres by highlighting
    "no" string on build.log. Then:
----------------------------------------------------------
   246  checking whether to use CROCO library (CSS2 w3c validation)... requested
   247  checking for CROCO... no
   248  libcroco-0.6.pc not found
   249  configure: WARNING: You requested libcroco support, but it doesn't seem
to be installed.
   250  checking whether to use TIDY library (HTML w3c validation)... requested
   251  checking for tidyCreate in -ltidy... no
   252  configure: WARNING: You requested libtidy support, but it doesn't seem
to be installed.
   253  checking whether to use CLAMAV library (virii scan)... requested
   254  checking for cl_loaddbdir in -lclamav... no
   255  configure: WARNING: You requested libclamav support, but it doesn't seem
to be installed.
   256  checking whether to use GNUTLS library (HTTPS check)... requested
----------------------------------------------------------
    Perhaps libcroco-devel, libtidy-devel, clamav-devel will
    enable these missing support.

  - Also please check if this is desired.
-----------------------------------------------------------
   293          Generate GTK doc        (gtkdoc)        : no
-----------------------------------------------------------

* Redundant Requires
-----------------------------------------------------------
Requires:	gnet2, gnutls
-----------------------------------------------------------
  - Usually these types of Requires are not needed.
    rpmbuild checks the dependencies for libraries and adds them
    to Requires automatically.
    For this package, you can see:
-----------------------------------------------------------
$ rpm -q --requires gurlchecker | grep '\(gnet\|gnutls\).*so*'
libgnet-2.0.so.0  
libgnutls.so.13  
libgnutls.so.13(GNUTLS_1_3)  
-----------------------------------------------------------
    So the dependencies for libraries in gnet2, gnutls are 
    added, which will pull gnet2 gnutls packages automatically.
    For example:
-----------------------------------------------------------
$ rpm -q --whatprovides libgnet-2.0.so.0
gnet2-2.0.7-10.fc8
-----------------------------------------------------------

* Perl module BuildRequires
  - For perl module BuildRequires, don't write the names of rpms
    directly, but write the module names needed for rebuild.
    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl

    In short: "BuildRequires: perl-XML-Parser" must be
    "BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser)"

* Desktop file
  - must be installed (checked) by desktop-file-install
    (BR: desktop-file-utils needed).

* Timestamp
  - This package installs some files from tarball directly
    (ex. png files) and perserving timestamps on those files
    is recommended. Check if
-------------------------------------------------------------
make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p"
-------------------------------------------------------------
    works (this method usually works for recent Makefiles).


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]