https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756582 --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer <cse.cem+redhatbugz@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michal Schorm from comment #7) > I belive this BZ doesn't deserve "FE-DEADREVIEW" status since it is days old > and actively worked on. > Haven't you meant different BZ? > I did set the "FE-NEEDSPONSOR" as the reporter stated that he is looking for > a sponsor. > -- > I removed the "FE-DEADREVIEW" flag. > If you set it intentionaly to this BZ, please provide further explanation. > Thank you Hi Michal, I believe DEADREVIEW was accidentally copied from the duplicate bug (my original submission from 2015 that languished without reviewers for years). Clearing it on this one is correct. Thanks Michal and Christopher for taking this on. Best, Conrad -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
