https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756899 Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> --- @J. Scheurich: (In reply to J. Scheurich from comment #1) > This is only a informal review, i am not in the packager group 8-( > > $ fedora-review -n upt > INFO: Processing local files: upt > ... > INFO: Build completed > INFO: Installing built package(s) > INFO: Install command returned error code 30 > > $ more /home/mufti/review-upt/review.txt > ... > ERROR: Command failed: > # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ > --releasever 32 --setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local > --disableplugin=spacewalk install > /home/mufti/review-upt/resultsupt-0.10.3-1.fc32.noarch.rpm > --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts > > Search for errors in root.log to see why the installation has failed (probably missing python-spdx-lookup) - This should be marked as okay: [-]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep Note: Cannot find any build in BUILD directory (--prebuilt option?) [-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should - Why did you mark this as Invalid? AFAIK the packager did not include extra license files. [!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. provide egg info. Also I sent you a new mail regarding sponsorship, please reply to it (it may be stuck in SPAM). (In reply to Jeremy Bertozzi from comment #0) > Spec URL: > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jbertozzi/copr-build-upt/master/upt.spec > SRPM URL: > https://github.com/jbertozzi/copr-build-upt/raw/master/SRPMS/upt-0.10.3-1. > fc30.src.rpm > > Description: A unified CLI tool that converts a package from a > language-specific package manager (such as PyPI or NPM) to an almost > ready-to-use package for Free Unix-based operating systems (such as a > GNU/Linux distribution or *BSD). > > FAS username: jbertozzi > > I am looking for a sponsor for this package, and its dependencies. Based on J. Scheurich review, I approve this package. You still need to find a sponsor, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
