[Bug 1326504] Review Request: htslib - C library for high-throughput sequencing data formats (required for `samtools`)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504



--- Comment #24 from Jun Aruga <jaruga@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Hi Dave,

> I defined `%global so_version 0.1` to use it like libhts.so.0.1
> I also opened the ticket to ask it on upstream.
> https://github.com/samtools/htslib/issues/932

I got a great feedback from a person in the upstream on the ticket.
The htslib's so version rule is following Fedora's glibc's rule.
So, can we use the built so files without changing so version, can't we?
If you like, I will revert my modification for %make_build and %make_install
line.

```
$ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libc-2.29.so 
glibc-2.29-15.fc30.x86_64

$ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libc.so.6 
glibc-2.29-15.fc30.x86_64

$ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libc.so
glibc-devel-2.29-15.fc30.x86_64

$ ls -l /usr/lib64/libc[-.]*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  6699224 Jun  6 14:09 /usr/lib64/libc-2.29.so*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 16258354 Jun  6 14:10 /usr/lib64/libc.a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root      253 Jun  6 13:55 /usr/lib64/libc.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root       12 Jun  6 13:55 /usr/lib64/libc.so.6 ->
libc-2.29.so*
```

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux