https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750765 --- Comment #4 from Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Artem from comment #2) > (In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #1) > > From RHBZ#1750590 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750590: > > - pycryptodome - an almost drop-in replacement for the old PyCrypto library > - pycryptodomex (already packaged in Fedora) - a library independent of the > old PyCrypto > > ! One must avoid having both PyCrypto and PyCryptodome installed at the same > time, as they will interfere with each other. > Yes, because PyCryptodome installs to the same location as the PyCrypto package. But pycryptodomex is still the _same_ package, just with a different import path. > Source: https://github.com/Legrandin/pycryptodome > > I tried to build Password Safe with 'python-pycryptodomex' but no luck > unfortunately. Yes, it's installed to PyCryptodome; you need to patch Password Safe to use that import instead. More than one package depends on PyCrypto, so using this proposed pycryptodome will cause Conflicts that could be avoided by using pycryptodomex. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
