https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747574 --- Comment #5 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ben Rosser from comment #4) > Thanks for taking this! Let me know what you'd like me to review in exchange. Can you take bug 1753084? It should be an easy review (famous last words). > I take your point that it's not really an "application", but I think there's > still some utility in letting users find it by the upstream name. How would > you feel about renaming the package to 'python-cocotb' but keeping 'cocotb' > as a provide? I think that's fine. I also think that the reason for requiring the "python-" prefix applies to this package, even though it isn't a traditional library. If there is ever a python 4, then this package will need dual subpackages for python3 and python4 just as much as traditional libraries do. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
