https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752139 --- Comment #6 from J. Scheurich <mufti11@xxxxxx> --- [!]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "*No copyright* GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (v2)". 600 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/mufti/review-ucblogo/licensecheck.txt [!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. Package do not contain a licence file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
