https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752288 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- Naming: Coin4 → coin4 [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_general_naming] Provides:Coin4 can be added. Requires: zlib-devel bzip2-devel → one per line please %description devel → there should be a dot at the end of the text. Looks all nice. Though I wonder one thing: is is worth to bother with alternatives? Maybe just make coin*-devel packages Conflict with each other? The user doesn't get much benefit either way: it is still not possible to build against multiple Coin versions at the same time, and conflicting packages are easier to implement. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
