https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748012 --- Comment #4 from Spike <SpikeFedora@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks a lot Petr for the review! Since https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text states that > If the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %license. If the source package does not include the text of the license(s), the packager should contact upstream and encourage them to correct this mistake. I went ahead and did exactly that: https://github.com/oasys/mkrdns/pull/5 This PR would also update the FSF's address. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
