https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748233 Michal Schorm <mschorm@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschorm@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #5 from Michal Schorm <mschorm@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Miroslav Suchý from comment #3) > > Hmm, I am really woried about those bundles in tarball - all those > pgloader-bundle-3.6.1/software/* Instead of that you have to use normal > libraries and packages in Fedora. And if they do not exists there yet, they > need to be packaged separately. In theory yes - all of the requirements should be also separately packed, prior to this package. However I see two main obstructions here. 1) The program is written in such a way, the Common LISP download the libraries at runtime (really, by curl). * The libraries are mostly latest push in the master branch of the project. * To resolve this and make things safer (different library version each run), we need to get them prior the runtime - either pack them, or bundle them. * The upstream release the bundle with specific library versions and marks this as a recommended way to pack the application to various OS. 2) There are ~70 LISP libraries in that bundle. Between following stable versions (of pgloader), most of them are updated to another specific version, so it would be hard to manage them packed separately. Given that that specific set of versions of those libraries is supported and tested configuration by the upstream, I'd stick to it for now. Do you agree? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
