https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741636 Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> --- - LICENSE file should be installed with %license not %doc - Not needed %defattr(-, root, root, -) - Not needed %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} rm -rf %{buildroot} in %install - You need to include the SystemD macros for ocsinventory-agent.service %post %systemd_post ocsinventory-agent.service %preun %systemd_preun ocsinventory-agent.service %postun %systemd_postun_with_restart ocsinventory-agent.service - Source0 is 404, you're missing a "v" before %{official_version}: Source0: https://github.com/OCSInventory-NG/UnixAgent/releases/download/v%{official_version}/Ocsinventory-Unix-Agent-%{official_version}.tar.gz - Not installable DEBUG util.py:600: Error: DEBUG util.py:600: Problem 1: conflicting requests DEBUG util.py:600: - nothing provides monitor-edid needed by perl-Ocsinventory-Agent-2.6.0-2.fc32.noarch DEBUG util.py:600: Problem 2: package ocsinventory-agent-2.6.0-2.fc32.x86_64 requires perl-Ocsinventory-Agent = 2.6.0-2.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:600: - conflicting requests DEBUG util.py:600: - nothing provides monitor-edid needed by perl-Ocsinventory-Agent-2.6.0-2.fc32.noarch - Own /usr/libexec/ocsinventory-agent %attr(0750, root, root) %{_libexecdir}/%{name}/ - use perl not %{__perl} - considers using perl-interpreter and perl-generators as BR to detect Requires Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file LICENSE is not marked as %license See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text - systemd_post is invoked in %post, systemd_preun in %preun, and systemd_postun in %postun for Systemd service files. Note: Systemd service file(s) in ocsinventory-agent See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/Scriptlets/#_scriptlets ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "GNU General Public License (v2)", "GPL (v2)", "*No copyright* CeCILL License (v2)", "Artistic License". 345 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/ocsinventory-agent/review-ocsinventory- agent/licensecheck.txt [!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/libexec/ocsinventory-agent [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: %defattr present but not needed [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [!]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 92160 bytes in 8 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Perl: [ ]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:. Note: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) missing? ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: %clean present but not required [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in ocsinventory-agent , perl-Ocsinventory-Agent [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: Mock build failed See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_use_rpmlint [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ocsinventory-agent-2.6.0-2.fc32.x86_64.rpm perl-Ocsinventory-Agent-2.6.0-2.fc32.noarch.rpm ocsinventory-agent-2.6.0-2.fc32.src.rpm ocsinventory-agent.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found fr ocsinventory-agent.x86_64: E: no-binary ocsinventory-agent.x86_64: E: non-readable /usr/libexec/ocsinventory-agent/ocsinventory-agent.cron 750 ocsinventory-agent.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/libexec/ocsinventory-agent/ocsinventory-agent.cron 750 perl-Ocsinventory-Agent.noarch: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/ocsinventory-agent ocsinventory-agent.src:144: W: macro-in-comment %{name} ocsinventory-agent.src:148: W: macro-in-comment %{_localstatedir} ocsinventory-agent.src:148: W: macro-in-comment %{name} ocsinventory-agent.src:154: W: macro-in-comment %{name} ocsinventory-agent.src:157: W: macro-in-comment %{_localstatedir} ocsinventory-agent.src:157: W: macro-in-comment %{name} ocsinventory-agent.src:172: W: macro-in-comment %{name} 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 7 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
