[Bug 1725924] Review Request: pveclib - Library for simplified access to PowerISA vector operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725924



--- Comment #22 from Steven Jay Munroe <munroesj52@xxxxxxxxx> ---
So here is a cleaner build on COPR using the latest master with a temporary tag
v1.0.2y.

https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/munroesj52/pveclib/fedora-30-ppc64le/00978483-pveclib/
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/munroesj52/pveclib/fedora-rawhide-ppc64le/00978483-pveclib/

Turns out the build process is really picked about all the version #s matching.
And having pveclib.spec in the source tree is a mistake. 

Now the rpmlint is clean expect the spelling of altivec.h:

$ rpmlint ./rpmbuild/
pveclib.ppc64le: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US altivec -> elective
pveclib.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US altivec -> elective
6 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

one weird thing is that the RPMS built by COPR have bad signatures

Error checking signature of
/home/sjmunroe/rpmtest/pveclib-debuginfo-1.0.2y-1.fc30.ppc64le.rpm:
/home/sjmunroe/rpmtest/pveclib-debuginfo-1.0.2y-1.fc30.ppc64le.rpm: digests
SIGNATURES NOT OK

rpm -ql complains: Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 81dc7181: NOKEY

But the ones I build on Fedora 30 P8 does NOT have these errors. 

I have no idea what this is oe how to deal with this.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux