https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1732735 Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Url and Source0 addresses are Ok. Source0 archive (SHA-256: 11774a6914bcfa0915f9f01c3041b16878d52ad86d83ecedbe62e68d4f41ecc1) is original. Ok. Summary is Ok. Description verified from lib/Module/Build/Using/PkgConfig.pm. Ok. License verified from lib/Module/Build/Using/PkgConfig.pm, LICENSE, and Build.PL. Ok. No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok. Buildrequires are Ok. All tests pass. Ok. $ rpmlint perl-Module-Build-Using-PkgConfig.spec ../SRPMS/perl-Module-Build-Using-PkgConfig-0.03-1.fc31.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Module-Build-Using-PkgConfig-0.03-1.fc31.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint is Ok. $ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Module-Build-Using-PkgConfig-0.03-1.fc31.noarch.rpm drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jul 24 13:24 /usr/share/doc/perl-Module-Build-Using-PkgConfig -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 498 Apr 11 14:06 /usr/share/doc/perl-Module-Build-Using-PkgConfig/Changes -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5704 Apr 11 14:06 /usr/share/doc/perl-Module-Build-Using-PkgConfig/README drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jul 24 13:24 /usr/share/licenses/perl-Module-Build-Using-PkgConfig -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18418 Apr 11 14:06 /usr/share/licenses/perl-Module-Build-Using-PkgConfig/LICENSE -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3996 Jul 24 13:24 /usr/share/man/man3/Module::Build::Using::PkgConfig.3pm.gz drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jul 24 13:24 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Module drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jul 24 13:24 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Module/Build drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jul 24 13:24 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Module/Build/Using -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12808 Jul 24 13:24 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Module/Build/Using/PkgConfig.pm File layout and permissions are Ok. $ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Module-Build-Using-PkgConfig-0.03-1.fc31.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.0) 1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.10.0 1 perl(base) 1 perl(ExtUtils::PkgConfig) 1 perl(Module::Build) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsZstd) <= 5.4.18-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -q --provides -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Module-Build-Using-PkgConfig-0.03-1.fc31.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c 1 perl(Module::Build::Using::PkgConfig) = 0.03 1 perl-Module-Build-Using-PkgConfig = 0.03-1.fc31 Binary provides are Ok. $ resolvedeps rawhide ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Module-Build-Using-PkgConfig-0.03-1.fc31.noarch.rpm Binary dependencies are resolvable. Ok. The package builds in F31 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36458530). Ok. This package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guide lines. Resolution: Package APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
