[Bug 246432] Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246432





------- Additional Comments From spr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-10-02 06:34 EST -------
I have fixed points 1), 2) 3), 5) 6) 7) and 8).

For point 9), the code is licensed under GPLv2+ and/or Artistic 1.0 (it can be
seen in file LEGAL). So I select GPLv2+, is that OK?

For point 4), I have included the following files:  AUTHORS LEGAL COPYING README
and LICENSE. Legal explains the dual licensing, LICENSE is the Artistic 1.0
license and COPYING is the GPL license.

SPEC: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/blitz.spec
SRPM: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/blitz-0.9-0.2.fc7.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]