https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1724271 --- Comment #8 from Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #7) > It would better if this the updated libmodulemd was kept unversioned and > libmodulemd1 was provided for backward compatibility, because it does not > look that upstream renamed the library or forked. This is an EPEL-only package. In Fedora, what you described already happened; we ship libmodulemd 2.x as libmodulemd and libmodulemd1 for compat. However, the `libmodulemd` package is in RHEL 7 and provides the 1.x version. We need support in EPEL for 2.x, so it has to come in as libmodulemd2 until and unless RHEL 7 starts carrying both. For the record, I *am* the upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
