https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727505 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |Github | |BlueBrain/BluePyOpt/issues/ | |280 Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ ^ Needs to be checked - I've filed a ticket asking upstream to add tests and licenses to the release, or make sure the github releases/tags match pypi so we can use them: https://github.com/BlueBrain/BluePyOpt/issues/280 We should use the github tar here. It contains: - license files - tests - docs. - Please complete the description. It is incomplete. Probably worth defining a macro and re-using it. Example here: https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/blob/master/f/spec-templates/python.spec#_10 Some more work needed. Unfortunately, the mock build seemed to have failed here. ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License (v3.0)". 17 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/asinha/dump/fedora-review/1727505-python- bluepyopt/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. ^ Is there a reason the automatic requirements generator is not used! The setup.py file seems to have them listed correctly. Best to use the automatic generator, and only list things that aren't found there manually. NOTE: Looks like it requires NEURON's python bindings which aren't in Fedora yet as a runtime dependency. It is OK to include this at the moment. When we have NEURON's python bits packaged, it can be added as a Requires. (Please make a note of this in the spec so we don't forget.) [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Maybe worth asking them to include the license in the pypi tar [ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [!]: Package functions as described. ^ Not yet checked [!]: Latest version is packaged. ^ 1.8.40 seems to be released now https://pypi.org/project/bluepyopt/ [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. ^ Github tar contains tests, should use that so we can run them. Also worth asking upstream to include tests in the pypi tar. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. ^ Does not seem to build [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: Mock build failed See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_use_rpmlint [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Installation errors ------------------- INFO: mock.py version 1.4.16 starting (python version = 3.7.4)... Start: init plugins INFO: selinux disabled Finish: init plugins Start: run Start: chroot init INFO: calling preinit hooks INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled dnf cache Start: cleaning dnf metadata Finish: cleaning dnf metadata INFO: enabled HW Info plugin Mock Version: 1.4.16 INFO: Mock Version: 1.4.16 Finish: chroot init INFO: installing package(s): /home/asinha/dump/fedora-review/1727505-python-bluepyopt/results/python3-bluepyopt-1.8.38-1.fc31.noarch.rpm ERROR: Command failed: # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 31 --setopt=deltarpm=False --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk install /home/asinha/dump/fedora-review/1727505-python-bluepyopt/results/python3-bluepyopt-1.8.38-1.fc31.noarch.rpm Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-bluepyopt-1.8.38-1.fc31.noarch.rpm python-bluepyopt-1.8.38-1.fc31.src.rpm python3-bluepyopt.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Bluebrain -> Blue brain, Blue-brain, Lamebrain python3-bluepyopt.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US optimisation -> optimization, improvisation, misapplication python3-bluepyopt.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US standardises -> standardizes, standardize, standards python3-bluepyopt.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US optimisations -> optimizations, optimization, improvisations python3-bluepyopt.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bpopt_tasksdb python-bluepyopt.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Bluebrain -> Blue brain, Blue-brain, Lamebrain python-bluepyopt.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US optimisation -> optimization, improvisation, misapplication python-bluepyopt.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US standardises -> standardizes, standardize, standards python-bluepyopt.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US optimisations -> optimizations, optimization, improvisations 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. Source checksums ---------------- https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/b/bluepyopt/bluepyopt-1.8.38.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 43581fda8c345ba4b53b1e478067f82440166adfbeb5c48dfb39988f7fb3976c CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 43581fda8c345ba4b53b1e478067f82440166adfbeb5c48dfb39988f7fb3976c Requires -------- python3-bluepyopt (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python3 python(abi) python3.7dist(deap) python3.7dist(efel) python3.7dist(future) python3.7dist(ipyparallel) python3.7dist(jinja2) python3.7dist(numpy) python3.7dist(pandas) python3.7dist(pickleshare) python3.7dist(scoop) python3.7dist(setuptools) python3dist(deap) python3dist(efel) python3dist(future) python3dist(ipyparallel) python3dist(jinja2) python3dist(numpy) python3dist(pandas) python3dist(pickleshare) python3dist(scoop) python3dist(setuptools) Provides -------- python3-bluepyopt: python3-bluepyopt python3.7dist(bluepyopt) python3dist(bluepyopt) Generated by fedora-review 0.7.2 (65d36bb) last change: 2019-04-09 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1727505 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, Python Disabled plugins: PHP, Ocaml, SugarActivity, Perl, Java, fonts, R, Haskell, C/C++ Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx