https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1726585 --- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > but there are many C++ headers Yes, there are, but expected, see the breakdown for rpmlint output: pythran.x86_64: E: devel-dependency boost-devel This is expected, this is a package that compiles code for the users. pythran.x86_64: E: no-binary This is expected, the package is noarch in its nature, yet arched for reasons explained in spec comment. pythran.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/pythran-config pythran.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pythran/pythonic/__builtin__/ArithmeticError.hpp pythran.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pythran/pythonic/__builtin__/AssertionError.hpp ... snip ... pythran.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pythran/pythonic/utils/yield.hpp All the (hundreds) devel-file-in-non-devel-package warnings are expected, this is a package that compiles code for the users. pythran.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/pythran/html/.buildinfo This could possibly be removed if we really want to. pythran.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/pythran/html/objects.inv pythran.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/pythran/html/objects.inv This is a "binary" file and rpmlint is wrong here. pythran.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pythran pythran.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pythran-config This is correct but I won't write one. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1642 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
