https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725924 --- Comment #10 from Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Steven Jay Munroe from comment #9) > > pveclib.src: W: invalid-license APACHE > > So you want this spelled out as "Apache Software License 2.0" or the short > form "ASL 2.0" ? should be the short name from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses > > pveclib.ppc64le: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib64/libpvec.so.0.0.0 > > The current build only uses the static libraries for some unit tests. As is > these libraries only contains arrays of large numeric constants. But this > might change in later pveclib version are more complex operations are added. > > > pveclib.ppc64le: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/licenses/pveclib/COPYING LICENSE > > looks like I am caught on the horns of the "LICENSE" vs "COPYING" > controversy: > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5678462/should-i-provide-a-license-txt- > or-copying-txt-file-in-my-project > > The symlink avoids duplicating the file. While preserving COPYING for lint > checks that insist on that file is there. > > Not sure why it is "dangling" because it is used in Makefile.am > > +dist_license_DATA = COPYING > > +dist_doc_DATA = CONTRIBUTING.md README.md ChangeLog.md > > Based on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536209 I assumed this > is what you (Fedora) wanted. AFAIK it's OK to have the license text part of the autotools "docs" and then the rpmbuild will care about the details in the background when %license and %doc tags are used in the spec. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
