https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447517 --- Comment #18 from sanford rockowitz <rockowitz@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Actually, I was surprised to receive a message re this bug report. I stopped receiving weekly notifications of inaction some time ago (IIRC at the time of the f29 release), and assumed the request for sponsor was dead. I had sent a sample review to the person who had offered to sponsor the package, annotated with comments and questions as to how to deal with things where I disagreed with fedora-review, e.g. the complaint about the hidden .build-id directory, and hadn't heard back. I guess we both dropped the ball. I have been following the Fedora developer list since the initial request for sponsor, and it is apparent that being a Fedora packager is a major commitment. My focus is on the upstream: fielding user questions and bug reports, developing a GUI version and associated API, etc. I do maintain the Debian version, which has become straightforward, but that's the extent of my official downstream involvement. (Ubuntu picks up ddcutil from Debian, and openSuSE picks it up because I use OBS for builds.) I'll continue to maintain a COPR build, but for now that needs to be the extent of my Fedora efforts. Please close the request for sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
