Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-printer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226466 ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2007-10-01 03:18 EST ------- With new updated SRPM, rpmlint on RPM gave me -------------------------------------------------- system-config-printer.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/redhat-print-applet.desktop ==> This can be ignored. system-config-printer.i386: E: no-binary ==> ok as we need system-config-printer-libs as i386 package and we can't use noarch type then in SPEC file. system-config-printer.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/system-config-printer ===> Is this(noreplace) not needed? system-config-printer.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm ==> Do you have any other workaround to avoid using rm? rpmlint on --libs RPM gave me --------------------------------------------------------- system-config-printer-libs.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/system-config-printer-libs-0.7.74.3/pycups-1.9.27/examples/cupstree.py ===> any reason to have this as valid. I saw most of packages installing example files with 0644 mode. system-config-printer-libs.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-printer/cupshelpers.py 0644 ===> This MUST be solved. As you said its upstream. Can you provide a new SRPM with upstream fix? system-config-printer-libs.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/dbus-1/system.d/newprinternotification.conf ===> Is this(noreplace) not needed? system-config-printer-libs.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/system-config-printer-libs-0.7.74.3/pycups-1.9.27/examples/cupstree.py /usr/bin/python ===> ==> But user can use this with python command also right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review