https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1637139 David Ward <david.ward@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david.ward@xxxxxxxxxx Flags| |needinfo?(kwizart@xxxxxxxxx | |) --- Comment #4 from David Ward <david.ward@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Nicolas, Fedora already ships with the configuration files for a "curated set" of third-party repositories containing non-free software. This includes a separate non-free repository by RPM Fusion that specifically contains packages for the NVIDIA graphics driver (only). https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Third_Party_Software_Repositories http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/nvidia-driver/ If RPM Fusion were to move/copy their existing "intel-media-driver" package from their "nonfree" repository into a new separate repository like this, would that be enough for Fedora to add it to its "curated set" of third-party repositories? Otherwise, what would be unacceptable or different in this case? Some users are not comfortable having the full RPM Fusion repositories configured on their system, but they do want an easy way to enable accelerated graphics using the vendor driver and are willing to accept its license. I assume that was the motivation which led to the separate NVIDIA driver repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
