https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #118 from Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller <cschalle@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I don't think its a waste of time the way the question is framed, and I don't want to put words in Tom's mouth here, but my answer would be 'yes of course people should feel free to try to work with Fraunhofer to improve their license text if they so wishes, but to be clear we are not going to block on that'. As a sidenote I have actually asked Fraunhofer about removing the clause since its obsolete, but so far no response beyond 'will think about it'. I pinged them again today to try to see if anything has changed, but if I don't hear back on that ping or get a negative response I don't personally plan on pursuing the license rewording any further as it doesn't really matter beyond laymen license clarity, but anyone else who feels inclined should feel free IMHO. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
