[Bug 291191] Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: XGrep - A  grep-like utility for XML files.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191


mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-09-30 03:27 EST -------
Well.

* tarball
  - It seems that the tarball included in your srpm differs from
    what is written on Source0.
----------------------------------------------------------------
[tasaka1@localhost xgrep]$ ls -al *gz */*gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 53960 2007-09-16 08:30
xgrep-0.06-1.fc7/xgrep-0.06.tar.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 53958 2007-09-30 03:22
xgrep-0.06-2.fc7/xgrep-0.06.tar.gz
-rw------- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 50804 2007-09-15 00:25 xgrep-0.06.tar.gz
[tasaka1@localhost xgrep]$ md5sum *gz */*gz
eca0ebe4f25caff7b72d61ded622a23d  xgrep-0.06.tar.gz
8fe924cfc104a81660f654b62ddc2f12  xgrep-0.06-1.fc7/xgrep-0.06.tar.gz
950405351245928e31e1557ac02d7334  xgrep-0.06-2.fc7/xgrep-0.06.tar.gz
----------------------------------------------------------------
    What tarball are you using? (and why do your tarballs change
    between -1 and -2?)

Anyway:
-------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: Before being sponsored:

This package will be accepted with another few work. 
But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) 
must sponsor you.

Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other 
submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. 
For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) 
are required to "show that you have an understanding 
of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described
on :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored

Usually there are two ways to show this.
A. submit other review requests with enough quality.
B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request
   (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do
   a formal review)

When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other 
person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report 
so that I can check your comments or review request.

Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to
review can be checked on:
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html
(NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review")


Review guidelines are described mainly on:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
------------------------------------------------------------



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]