https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1719008 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for the quick review! > Move the BuildRequires for Python 3 to the %package for Python3 section I kept them at the top on purpose. I assume that the python2 part will go away soon, and then all BRs will be at the top. > Source0 Updated to https://github.com/facelessuser/soupsieve/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz. I pushed an updated srpm/spec with just this change: Spec URL: https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/python-soupsieve.spec SRPM URL: https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/python-soupsieve-1.9.1-1.fc31.src.rpm So... I need the python2 subpackage for bs4. A bunch of other packages depened on python2-bs4: $ dnf repoquery --release=31 --whatrequires python2-beautifulsoup4 mote-0:0.6.2-10.fc30.noarch packagedb-cli-0:2.14.1-9.fc30.noarch python2-fedora-0:0.10.0-8.fc30.noarch python2-fmn-lib-0:0.8.2-8.fc29.noarch python2-webtest-0:2.0.30-3.fc30.noarch $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires python2-beautifulsoup4 chromium-0:73.0.3683.103-1.fc31.src mote-0:0.6.2-10.fc30.src python-fmn-lib-0:0.8.2-8.fc29.src python-html5-parser-0:0.4.6-1.fc31.src python-webtest-0:2.0.30-3.fc30.src It seems like not including the python2 subpackage will make the bs4 upgrade very hard. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx