https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713767 --- Comment #20 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Björn Persson from comment #19) > Issues to be resolved > ===================== > > · The man pages are BSD-licensed, so BSD must be mentioned in the license > tag of libnbd-devel. At least in this case the LGPL does not apply to the > BSD-licensed files. Damn, this is a mistake. The man pages are supposed to contain the LGPLv2+ blurb. I have fixed this upstream now: https://github.com/libguestfs/libnbd/commit/8b6e4ccda1a51cd840bb47a3f12e0b4000788130 > · I'm awaiting your decision on a license for the examples. Do you want to > use CC0 or 0BSD? (I don't see 0BSD in the list of good licenses by the way.) > As I understand it you can call it Public Domain only if the files > explicitly say "public domain": > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > LicensingGuidelines/#_public_domain I had an email back from Richard Fontana saying that CC0 is no longer recommended (it doesn't contain a patent grant). https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/JR53JW52OKOL2S6O27NMNMO5SIM356X6/ As I'm familiar with the simple BSD license that we used for nbdkit, I will use that for the examples: https://github.com/libguestfs/libnbd/commit/e498c3b16f6acb70f5768fe6d508aa986fb3ba63 > · I still need to study how GnuTLS works to understand the situation with > the crypto policy. I hope you'll get an answer on the devel list. I'm pretty certain what we're doing is correct, as this is how libvirt has worked and they changed to this after discussions with the GnuTLS maintainer. As there are a number of upstream changes required, I'm going to do a 0.1.1 release upstream and post another package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
