https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706659 --- Comment #5 from Ryan Curtin <ryan@xxxxxxxxx> --- I should add, since ensmallen is header-only, the tests are primarily of importance for ensuring everything compiles. They are also tests of the internal optimizers, but given that during development the issue you see hasn't been encountered at all, I'm not sure we can effectively resolve it at the packaging level. We could report it upstream (although I am part of upstream :)) but I have no idea how long it will take to even reproduce, and I don't know if it makes sense to hold up adding the package on that. (Especially since adding ensmallen is a dependency for new versions of mlpack, so mlpack can't be updated until then.) Let me know what you think, and thanks again for your time. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
