https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1668010 --- Comment #8 from Felix Schwarz <fschwarz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Tom, seems like nobody is willing to review this... Anyway we had a ROCm 2.4 release recently while this package is still based on ROCm 2.0. Do you think it will be useful to upgrade this package before a full review or is that just unnecessary churn? Regarding the "clara" bundling I think this is needed as per Fedora's packaging policy ( https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling ). See also: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/BDPFWPWE7SKOHCEYF6T6QP27UU73SPPV/ I still need some time to clean up some other Fedora package (borgbackup, bug 1669083) but I plan to go through this package afterwards (and will probably nudge a few people to either review my notes or do the formal review). I'm really looking forward to having the ROCm stack available on Fedora easily. (Usual disclaimer: If someone else is ready to review this please just do.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
