https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701013 --- Comment #11 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Carl George from comment #9) > > > I went ahead and added explicit requires on both shiboken2 and shiboken2-libs. > > > Requires: python3-shiboken2 > > Requires: python3-shiboken2-libs > > What provides python3-shiboken2? I don't see that in the spec file, either > as a subpackage or as a virtual provides. Speaking of, why are > python3-pyside2 and python3-shiboken2-libs not named similarly? Both have > similar contents, so at first glance it seem that python3-shiboken2-libs > should just be named python3-shiboken2. Let me know if I'm missing > something here. Whoops, fixed the first one to just shiboken2. I was trying to mimic the original pyside packaging as much as possible, but I could be convinced otherwise. (In reply to Carl George from comment #10) > > [ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. > > All the licenses are in the python3-pyside2 package, but installing other > packages doesn't always pull it in as a dependency. If the dependencies are > correct, then the different subpackages should all own the license files. Yeah, I dumped them in there initially. I'm going through the source files now to see which is which. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
