[Bug 1707080] Review Request: osmo-fl2k - Turns FL2000-based USB 3.0 to VGA adapters into low cost DACs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707080



--- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Petr Menšík from comment #2)
Thanks for the review.

> Found issues:
> * The package produces strange named so library
> /usr/lib64/libosmo-fl2k.so.0.1git. I think numbers are expected to be in so
> version name, git should not be present.
> * No release tarball URL is specified. Spec file should at least contain
> link to the source code repository, which is also missing. It is not clear
> where provided source comes from.
> * Also, binaries and libraries should not be part of single package, libs
> subpackage should be used [1].

Hopefully all fixed.

> * File /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/10-osmo-fl2k.rules is shipped, but its
> directory is not owned by package or required by the package (systemd-udev
> or kexec-tools).
> 
I think this is not needed [1]

[1]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_the_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux