Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-09-27 16:10 EST ------- Oops. Let's try that again: emacs-bbdb.src: W: spelling-error-in-description recieved received Funny rpmlint, but correct. emacs-bbdb.src: W: invalid-license GPL The license needs some adjusting to meet the current guidelines. I believe the proper tag for this package is "GPLv2+" according to the comment block at the head of bbdb.el emacs-bbdb.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/info/bbdb.info.gz emacs-bbdb.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/emacs-bbdb-2.35/ChangeLog A quick call to iconv should fix these up. emacs-bbdb.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/emacs-bbdb-2.35/utils/bbdb-cid.pl "/usr/local/bin/perl5" emacs-bbdb.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/emacs-bbdb-2.35/utils/bbdb-unlazy-lock.pl "/usr/local/bin/perl" emacs-bbdb.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/emacs-bbdb-2.35/utils/bbdb-srv.pl "/usr/local/bin/perl" Even though these are packaged as documentation, it would still be nice if these were fixed up with some quick calls to sed. emacs-bbdb-el.noarch: W: no-documentation This is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review