https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701013 --- Comment #9 from Carl George <carl@george.computer> --- > so per the conversation in the devel mailing list I think I'm going to leave them be. For posterity: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/UPAU75JYH7MNPEQ2TQD7YX6NIUPZSCT3/ > I went ahead and added explicit requires on both shiboken2 and shiboken2-libs. > Requires: python3-shiboken2 > Requires: python3-shiboken2-libs What provides python3-shiboken2? I don't see that in the spec file, either as a subpackage or as a virtual provides. Speaking of, why are python3-pyside2 and python3-shiboken2-libs not named similarly? Both have similar contents, so at first glance it seem that python3-shiboken2-libs should just be named python3-shiboken2. Let me know if I'm missing something here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
