Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) Alias: libHX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307601 panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2007-09-27 11:56 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. ae2c7ac182a03e589fd45a7867177a0a libHX-1.10.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + libHX.pc files are present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + libHX package -> Requires: libHX.so.10 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides: libHX.so.10 + libHX-devel package -> Requires: libHX = 1.10.1-1.fc8 libHX.so.10 pkgconfig + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review