[Bug 304301] Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pysol -  A Python Solitaire game collection


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301





------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2007-09-27 11:44 EST -------
Hmm, yes, that hack works.  A few issues cropped up in testing, though:

One, which I don't think is a blocker but is annoying, is that when you start
pysol from the command line you get a bunch of spew:

Error loading plugin /usr/share/pysol/games/acesup.py: duplicate game ID 903
Error loading plugin /usr/share/pysol/games/auldlangsyne.py: duplicate game ID 172
[etc...]

I thought it was loading both the uncompiled and compiled versions of each file,
but I deleted the .py[oc] files and it still happens.

Another issue is that I can't pick many of the games; for example, Baker's Dozen
just gives me a dialog (that I can't paste from, damn it) containing:

Internal error.  Please report this bug:
<type 'exceptions.TypeError'>:
unbound method startGame() must be called with CastlesInSpain instance as first
argument (got BakersDozen instance instead)

Perhaps it's related to the previous issue.

There are also a couple of review issues:

Source: tags should be URLs if possible.  I don't see where pysol-4.82.tar.bz2
comes from, though; upstream only has the -src tarball.  Where'd you get it?

Might as well tack a period onto the end of %description.

Review:
? can't check if source files match upstream.
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK (could use a period, I guess).
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   pysol = 4.82-5.fc8
  =
   /bin/sh
   /usr/bin/env
   tcl
   tix
   tk
   tkinter
X Manual testing shows many issues.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* desktop file looks good.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]