Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307821 ------- Additional Comments From nando@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-09-26 17:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > GPL is not a valid value for the License-Tag, see: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-f21ae23bf2f278444e2c385463cfa74a502396b8 Thanks, changed to GPLv2+ (updated spec file linked above) > Afaik, these categories in the desktop file should not be used: > X-Fedora Application Do you have a reference by any chance on categories that should / should not be included in desktop files? In my fc6 machine I have 335 application desktop files. Of those that are not from Planet CCRMA origin: 185 have "Application;" in their category 84 have "X-Fedora;" in their category list A similar result happens in fc7. > And I guess these, too: > X-PlanetCCRMA > X-Digital_Processing > X-Jack I'd rather preserve X-Digital_Processing and X-Jack. With a full Planet CCRMA install the "Applications" -> "Sound & Video" is very very long. Planet CCRMA currently includes a separate menu tree (currently "Applications" -> "Planet CCRMA" but could be renamed if it ever becomes part of Fedora, of course) that further categorizes apps with the end result that the menu is actually usable to find and use applications. Leaving those categories in does not affect systems without the extra menu structure but makes the system much more usable in those that have it. > Maybe you want to add this category: > Audio This one does not seem to be very popular either, only 7 entries in my fc6 system (I'm not saying this is not the proper entry, only that it does not seem to be used). Thanks for the feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review