https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686506 --- Comment #26 from Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@xxxxxxxxx> --- There seems to be a lot of disconnect here. Essentially, Joe's been working on WireGuard on Fedora/RHEL for a really long time and has been intimately involved with packaging for the process. He knows enormous amounts about upstream development. Meanwhile eager Fedora packagers have come along, which is great and encouraging, and there's certainly an opportunity here. But clearly the approach and the attitude is pretty out of sync with the expectations of both our tens of thousands of users and of upstream. And the current direction is not sounding very appealing from a packaging direction as well. I'd encourage this approach: close this bug, get Joe started on official Fedora packaging induction, and when things are ready to go, Joe will open a new bug report with the package he intends to add. At that time if the OP's of this bug are interested in helping him out with the package, Joe can use his judgement. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
