https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687872 Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> --- I've got a test error: + /usr/bin/python3 setup.py test running test running egg_info writing sphinx_removed_in.egg-info/PKG-INFO writing dependency_links to sphinx_removed_in.egg-info/dependency_links.txt writing requirements to sphinx_removed_in.egg-info/requires.txt writing top-level names to sphinx_removed_in.egg-info/top_level.txt reading manifest file 'sphinx_removed_in.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' writing manifest file 'sphinx_removed_in.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' running build_ext BUILDSTDERR: test_sphinx_build (tests.test_extension.TestExtension) ... /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/jinja2/sandbox.py:82: DeprecationWarning: Using or importing the ABCs from 'collections' instead of from 'collections.abc' is deprecated, and in 3.8 it will stop working BUILDSTDERR: from collections import MutableSet, MutableMapping, MutableSequence BUILDSTDERR: /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/docutils/io.py:245: DeprecationWarning: 'U' mode is deprecated BUILDSTDERR: self.source = open(source_path, mode, **kwargs) BUILDSTDERR: ERROR BUILDSTDERR: ====================================================================== BUILDSTDERR: ERROR: test_sphinx_build (tests.test_extension.TestExtension) BUILDSTDERR: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- BUILDSTDERR: Traceback (most recent call last): BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sphinx_testing/util.py", line 166, in decorator BUILDSTDERR: return func(*(args + (app, status, warning)), **kwargs) BUILDSTDERR: File "/builddir/build/BUILD/sphinx-removed-in-0.1.3/tests/test_extension.py", line 14, in test_sphinx_build BUILDSTDERR: app.build() BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sphinx/application.py", line 338, in build BUILDSTDERR: self.builder.build_update() BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sphinx/builders/__init__.py", line 326, in build_update BUILDSTDERR: len(to_build)) BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sphinx/builders/__init__.py", line 339, in build BUILDSTDERR: updated_docnames = set(self.read()) BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sphinx/builders/__init__.py", line 445, in read BUILDSTDERR: self._read_serial(docnames) BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sphinx/builders/__init__.py", line 467, in _read_serial BUILDSTDERR: self.read_doc(docname) BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sphinx/builders/__init__.py", line 511, in read_doc BUILDSTDERR: doctree = read_doc(self.app, self.env, self.env.doc2path(docname)) BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sphinx/io.py", line 324, in read_doc BUILDSTDERR: pub.publish() BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/docutils/core.py", line 217, in publish BUILDSTDERR: self.settings) BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sphinx/io.py", line 117, in read BUILDSTDERR: self.parse() BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/docutils/readers/__init__.py", line 78, in parse BUILDSTDERR: self.parser.parse(self.input, document) BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sphinx/parsers.py", line 94, in parse BUILDSTDERR: self.statemachine.run(inputlines, document, inliner=self.inliner) BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/docutils/parsers/rst/states.py", line 171, in run BUILDSTDERR: input_source=document['source']) BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/docutils/statemachine.py", line 239, in run BUILDSTDERR: context, state, transitions) BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/docutils/statemachine.py", line 460, in check_line BUILDSTDERR: return method(match, context, next_state) BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/docutils/parsers/rst/states.py", line 2326, in explicit_markup BUILDSTDERR: nodelist, blank_finish = self.explicit_construct(match) BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/docutils/parsers/rst/states.py", line 2338, in explicit_construct BUILDSTDERR: return method(self, expmatch) BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/docutils/parsers/rst/states.py", line 2081, in directive BUILDSTDERR: directive_class, match, type_name, option_presets) BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/docutils/parsers/rst/states.py", line 2130, in run_directive BUILDSTDERR: result = directive_instance.run() BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sphinx/domains/changeset.py", line 85, in run BUILDSTDERR: classes = ['versionmodified', versionlabel_classes[self.name]] BUILDSTDERR: KeyError: 'versionremoved' BUILDSTDERR: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- BUILDSTDERR: Ran 1 test in 0.407s BUILDSTDERR: FAILED (errors=1) BUILDSTDERR: Test failed: <unittest.runner.TextTestResult run=1 errors=1 failures=0> BUILDSTDERR: error: Test failed: <unittest.runner.TextTestResult run=1 errors=1 failures=0> BUILDSTDERR: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GySHAG (%check) BUILDSTDERR: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GySHAG (%check) Seems you already reported upstream https://github.com/MrSenko/sphinx-removed-in/issues/5 Let me know if you want me to accept the package as is or wait for a fix from upstream. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "*No copyright* BSD (unspecified)". 8 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-sphinx-removed-in/review-python- sphinx-removed-in/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-sphinx-removed-in-0.1.3-1.fc31.noarch.rpm python-sphinx-removed-in-0.1.3-1.fc31.src.rpm python3-sphinx-removed-in.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) versionremoved -> version removed, version-removed, introversion python3-sphinx-removed-in.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C versionremoved and removed-in directives for Sphinx python3-sphinx-removed-in.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US versionremoved -> version removed, version-removed, introversion python-sphinx-removed-in.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) versionremoved -> version removed, version-removed, introversion python-sphinx-removed-in.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C versionremoved and removed-in directives for Sphinx python-sphinx-removed-in.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US versionremoved -> version removed, version-removed, introversion 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
