https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686506 --- Comment #17 from Joe Doss <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Your response doesn't really address my questions, so let me rephrase: We should make the needed changes between these two packages so we have some sort of path to migrate people to the Fedora package instead of using the one in copr. There are a ton of people using my repo and I want to make sure they have a good experience moving over to this package if this makes it into Fedora. If there are specific changes that need to happen to my spec, I am willing to do so in order to move them off of the wireguard-tools in the copr repo. What changes are needed to ensure end users are taken care of here? Also, to be more to the point. Upstream very much enjoys the swiftness of new package bumps and thorough testing, when they're making new releases. Are you available to do these as diligently and quickly as the large userbase has grown to expect? If not, do you want help? I have maintained this my copr repo as the official Fedora for the WireGuard project since 2016 and I am thrilled that someone else has taken the time to push it into Fedora proper. I don't mind continuing to do so if you want to collaborate on it together. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
