https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686506 Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(Jason@xxxxxxxxx) --- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #11) > I'm hesitating between either: > > - renaming to wireguard-tools > - or keeping wireguard as a meta package and adding -tools as a subpackage > > The meta would Requires tools and Recommends the kmod until it is in > mainline. > > I'd like input from you's (Neal, Lubomir) regarding the best course of > action. I'd go for renaming the package to wireguard-tools. It's clearly what upstream wants. We can do "Recommends: kmod(wireguard.ko)" until it is mainlined, which will hopefully be soon. @Jason, has there been any progress on getting WireGuard mainlined? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
