https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673393 --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> --- I was told the bundled thingie are automated by nodejs-packaging. - Use Source0: antora-cli-%{version}.tgz Source1: antora-cli-tarball.sh - You need to take into account all the licenses of the modules you bundle: *No copyright* BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License ------------------------------------------------------ package/node_modules/sprintf-js/bower.json package/node_modules/sprintf-js/package.json *No copyright* Expat License ---------------------------- package/node_modules/minimist/LICENSE package/node_modules/moment/README.md Apache License (v2.0) --------------------- package/node_modules/convict/LICENSE BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License --------------------------------- package/node_modules/esprima/LICENSE.BSD package/node_modules/esprima/bin/esparse.js package/node_modules/esprima/bin/esvalidate.js BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License --------------------------------------- package/node_modules/sprintf-js/LICENSE Expat License ------------- package/node_modules/argparse/LICENSE package/node_modules/camelcase-keys/license package/node_modules/camelcase/license package/node_modules/commander/LICENSE package/node_modules/convict/node_modules/json5/LICENSE.md package/node_modules/decamelize/license package/node_modules/depd/LICENSE package/node_modules/js-yaml/LICENSE package/node_modules/json5/LICENSE.md package/node_modules/lodash.clonedeep/LICENSE package/node_modules/lodash.clonedeep/index.js package/node_modules/map-obj/license package/node_modules/moment/LICENSE package/node_modules/quick-lru/license package/node_modules/validator/LICENSE package/node_modules/validator/validator.js package/node_modules/validator/validator.min.js ISC License ----------- package/node_modules/@iarna/toml/LICENSE package/node_modules/yargs-parser/LICENSE.txt Mozilla Public License (v2.0) ----------------------------- package/README.md package/node_modules/@antora/playbook-builder/README.md Public domain ------------- package/node_modules/deep-freeze/LICENSE package/node_modules/deep-freeze/readme.markdown Add the to the License: field and add a comment explaining the license breakdown. - You should own %{nodejs_sitelib}/@%{npm_org} %dir %{nodejs_sitelib}/@%{npm_org} - Test fails: BUILDSTDERR: ++ /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nodejs-antora-cli-2.0.0-2.fc31.x86_64//usr/bin/antora --version BUILDSTDERR: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.EBuEQ7: line 32: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/nodejs-antora-cli-2.0.0-2.fc31.x86_64//usr/bin/antora: No such file or directory FAIL + [[ '' == 2.0.0 ]] + echo FAIL + exit 0 It seems it's because the symlink point to an invalid location: nodejs-antora-cli.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/antora ../lib/node_modules/antora/@cli/bin/antora It should be: ln -sf ../lib/node_modules/@%{npm_org}/%{org_subpkg}/bin/antora %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/antora → Notice the @ placement - Remove the dot at the end of the summary: nodejs-antora-cli.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot C The command line interface for Antora. - Fix shebang → /usr/bin/node nodejs-antora-cli.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/node_modules/@antora/cli/lib/cli.js /usr/bin/env node nodejs-antora-cli.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/node_modules/@antora/cli/lib/cli.js 644 /usr/bin/env node Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Public domain", "*No copyright* Expat License", "Unknown or generated", "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License", "ISC License", "Apache License (v2.0)", "*No copyright* Mozilla Public License (v2.0)", "Expat License", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "Mozilla Public License (v2.0)", "*No copyright* BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License". 644 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/nodejs-antora-cli/review- nodejs-antora-cli/licensecheck.txt [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/node_modules/@antora [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: nodejs-antora-cli-2.0.0-2.fc31.noarch.rpm nodejs-antora-cli-2.0.0-2.fc31.src.rpm nodejs-antora-cli.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C The command line interface for Antora. nodejs-antora-cli.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib nodejs-antora-cli.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/antora ../lib/node_modules/antora/@cli/bin/antora nodejs-antora-cli.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/node_modules/@antora/cli/lib/cli.js /usr/bin/env node nodejs-antora-cli.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/node_modules/@antora/cli/lib/cli.js 644 /usr/bin/env node nodejs-antora-cli.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/node_modules/@antora/cli/node_modules/.bin nodejs-antora-cli.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/node_modules/@antora/cli/node_modules/.bin nodejs-antora-cli.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/node_modules/@antora/cli/node_modules/convict/node_modules/.bin nodejs-antora-cli.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/node_modules/@antora/cli/node_modules/convict/node_modules/.bin nodejs-antora-cli.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/node_modules/@antora/cli/node_modules/deep-freeze/.travis.yml nodejs-antora-cli.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/node_modules/@antora/cli/node_modules/minimist/.travis.yml nodejs-antora-cli.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/node_modules/@antora/cli/node_modules/sprintf-js/.npmignore nodejs-antora-cli.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary antora nodejs-antora-cli.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot C The command line interface for Antora. nodejs-antora-cli.src:10: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/node_modules/@%{npm_org}/%{org_subpkg}/.*$ nodejs-antora-cli.src:53: W: macro-in-comment %{nodejs_symlink_deps} nodejs-antora-cli.src: W: invalid-url Source0: antora-cli-2.0.0.tgz 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 14 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
