[Bug 302451] Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302451





------- Additional Comments From petersen@xxxxxxxxxx  2007-09-24 03:29 EST -------
> * Similar with bug 300651, COPYRIGHT.ks can be converted to UTF-8.

Yes, thanks.

> * Well, while this package uses relative symlink on
>   %_sysconfdir/X11/fontpath.d, bug 300651 uses absolute symlink.
>   Would you unify them? (for these symlinks, all other packages
>   seem to use absolute symlinks)

Actually now I made it relative in baekmuk-ttf-fonts now too, but if 
it is a bad idea I can revert.

> * %ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) files 
>   "fonts.cache-1" "encodings.dir" are no longer needed?

Yes, I think they can go.

(In reply to comment #3)
>   Similar with bug 300651, "Conflicts: fonts-korean <= <somever>" is better

Hmm, maybe it makes sense, though I think this is no actual conflict
of files.

> ... By the way koji seems down

Seems to be mostly back now, I think. :)


Spec URL:
http://people.redhat.com/petersen/reviews/baekmuk-bdf/baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.redhat.com/petersen/reviews/baekmuk-bdf/baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-2.fc7.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]