https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684346 --- Comment #8 from Andy Li <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Ben, I added the prefix to be consistent with openSUSE's ocaml-dune package. I've no objection against adding a provides on "dune", or even just name it as "dune" instead of "ocaml-dune". For the record, Debian currently package it without any prefix, but also considered adding one as discussed in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919953: > ---DRAFT---DRAFT---DRAFT---DRAFT---DRAFT---DRAFT---DRAFT---DRAFT--- > > 1. Dune (numerics) does not see a good enough reason to stop dune (ocaml) > taking the /usr/bin/dune filename. > > 2. Dune (numerics) does not see a problem in dune (ocaml) using "dune" or > "libdune" in package names, as long as "ocaml" also appears in the package > name. > > ---DRAFT---DRAFT---DRAFT---DRAFT---DRAFT---DRAFT---DRAFT---DRAFT--- Best, Andy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
