Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 ------- Additional Comments From petersen@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-09-24 00:03 EST ------- Thanks, Tasaka-san for all your good comments. :) (In reply to comment #9) > * Still CID fmap is owned by every subpackage. Oops, fixing > ? By the way, how do we treat the ownership of > %_datadir/ghostscript/conf.d ? > - Now as fonts-korean will require baekmuk fonts subpackages, > baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common should own the directory? Agreed. We don't want to require ghostscript. > - IMO, in the future the ownership of the directory > (%_datadir/ghostscript/fonts.d) should be moved to > filesystem as well as %_datadir/ghostscript? Yes, that would probably be good, though then %_datadir/ghostscript would have to be there too I guess. > * Please update the contents of CID fmap files. > Currently They refer to /usr/share/fonts/korean/TrueType/batang.ttf ... Thanks for catching that - I had forgotten about it. > One more thing > ? Maybe it is better that -common package is marked as in conflict > with "fonts-korean < 2.2-5" ? Ok, thanks added that too. Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-5.fc7.src.rpm [28MB] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review