Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 ------- Additional Comments From petersen@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-09-23 22:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Here "install -m 0644" should be "install -p -m 0644". Ok, thanks - fixing. :) > - introduce a base package (say: "baekmuk-ttf-fonts-base"), > - and have CIP fmap, copying file and other files owned by -base > package > - and have other subpackages require -base package. Ok, thanks for that - good idea. I called it -common for now. > > Ok, let me remove the Provides. > ? This means you will write "Provides: ttfonts-ko = <somever>" in > original fonts-korean package (and make fonts-korean require > all baekmuk fonts subpackages)? fonts-korean will require all the baekmuk packages for the time being yes (certainly for F8). I am kind of tempted to just drop the ttfonts-ko provides though, since we don't really want to provide it forever, but if necessary we could still provide it I suppose. > > Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/petersen/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec > ? By the way the URL above is not accessible from me. Instead > http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec > works. Ugh, sorry about that: thought I was editing the fixed url. Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-4.fc7.src.rpm [28MB] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review