https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671571 --- Comment #19 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Dridi Boukelmoune from comment #18) > > Now there are a few things I'm not too happy with in this spec at a single > glance: > > The main package should not need to require the -libs sub-package, it should > be detected automatically via linker information in binaries. > This is actually a matter of policy for interdependencies like this. This prevents weird things from happening because often private symbols are used from -libs subpackage from other parts of the same source package. That, of course, is not true for external consumers. > > After that I'll be happy to move on to a formal review, but my availability > will be limited for a couple weeks. I can take over the review if you want? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
