Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 ------- Additional Comments From petersen@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-09-23 20:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > * Use "-p" option for "cp" or "install" to keep timestamp Not sure what you mean here: I don't see any cp usage currently in .spec. > ? So FAPIcidfmap.ko and cidfmap.ko, COPYRIGHT* README are instaled > in each subpackage? Currently, yes. Installing the CID fmap files in each package is not ideal, but I can't see a better way without introducing some messy scripts say and it should not have any particular adverse affects I think. The %doc files are all small so I don't see a big problem with duplicating them in each subpackage. > ? Why can each subpackage have "Provides: ttfonts-ko = %{ttfontverhead}"? > I guess only when all subpackages are installed, they can provide > "ttfonts-ko = %{ttfontverhead}" for consistency with the state before > kkfonts related packages are seperated? Ok, let me remove the Provides. > * /etc should be %_sysconfdir ah yes, thanks > ? What happens if /usr/bin/fc-cache fails by some reason? Shrug, I am just using the standard Font scriptlets, but if you want I can protect the fc-cache invocations in %post and %postun. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/petersen/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/petersen/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-3.fc7.src.rpm [28MB] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review