https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666294 --- Comment #9 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #8) > My suggestion (lately) would be to just use "Pure Python Levenshtein > implementation" as Summary. There's no need to repeat any license issues > again because we've the License: and %license parts. That's a good point. I'll adapt it when I submit the next build. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
